Thursday, July 5, 2012

Charlie's Pension - Who Is Really Benefitting from QE?

Now that the Bank of England has upped the QE ante by another £50 billion yet again (but what's a few tens of billions of pounds between good friends, right?), I got to wondering who exactly it is that is benefitting from all of the actions by the world's central bankers?  We know who it isn't:


1.) It isn't the economy; with the world standing on the precipice of the next recession because economic growth rates have been falling steadily since their 2010 post-recessional peak, no one is benefitting from a robust import or export market.

2.) It isn't Main Street's pension plans; with many pension plans, both private and public, seriously underfunded because of a prolonged period of near-zero interest rates, we'll be lucky to collect anything reasonable when we hit the magic age.  Corporations are being forced to top-up their pension shortfalls or, like General Motors, are forcing pension recipients to take the risk by changing their pension schemes from defined benefit to defined contribution.

3.) It isn't the unemployed; with unemployment in the Eurozone hitting a new record of 11.1 percent and the American unemployment rate stuck firmly over 8 percent, we certainly cannot say that QE has impacted the employment picture.

So, if it's not these three groups that are benefitting, who is?  Fortunately, I think I may have found the answer!

Let's open with the rogues gallery:

It's always nice to put a face to a name, isn't it?  In case you weren't aware, these three gentlemen head the Bank of England, one of the world's most influential central banks.

Here is a chart from the 2012 Annual Report of the Bank of England that tells us the tale of who benefits from the easing fun'n'games:


Deputy Governor Mr. Bean (and again, not THAT Mr. Bean) saw the size of his pension cash equivalent rise by £1,035,200 from the end of February 2011 to the end of February 2012, an increase of 41.1 percent on a year-over-year basis.  Not bad for a one year rate of return, is it?  The cash equivalent value of of his pension is now £3,555,600 ($5.582 million) and he will collect an annual pension of £101,900 ($159,983) upon his retirement.  Mr. Tucker saw the size of his pension cash equivalent rise by £1,350,000 over the same time frame, an increase of "only" 36.9 percent on a year-over-year basis.  Poor sod.  The cash equivalent of his pension now sits at £5,006,600 ($7.86 million) and he will collect an annual pension of £142,000 ($222,940) upon his retirement.

How did the Bank's pension plan get such a good rate of return on behalf of these two gentlemen?  The plan is nearly 100 percent invested in gilts (the equivalent of Treasuries).  As yields drop (due to all of that easing), the price of gilts rises, pushing up the asset value of the Bank's pension plan.  Sources at the Bank of England told the Telegraph that the largest part of the increase in the value of the pension plan was due to the sharp fall in gilt yields and the resulting rise in the price of said gilts.  Isn't that just a wonderful side benefit of being a central banker?  Your actions can impact the ultimate value of your pension!  How cool is that?

I know that some of you will ask, why, if the pension plans at the Bank of England have risen in value as bond prices rose, do we find that pension plans in the private sector are finding themselves seriously underfunded?  There's a very simple answer; private sector pension plans are almost never fully invested in government bonds of any type, rather, over recent years, they tended to invest more heavily in equities in a desperate search for a reasonable yield that would enable them to balance their liabilities with their assets.

I hope that you enjoyed reading this posting as much as I enjoyed typing it!  I know that I will sleep so much better tonight finally knowing that there are at least two people in the world that have directly benefitted from QE.  And, just in case you had forgotten, it was the infamous Mr. Bean that admonished whinging seniors back in 2010 that they "...shouldn't necessarily expect to be able to live just off their incomes in times when interest rates are low.  It may make sense for them to eat into their capital a bit."  Well spoken, sir.  After all, how can we expect the economy to grow if consumers don't spend, spend, spend until we pass out in pain.


18 comments:

  1. Thank you, great post! :-)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks Natasha. I particularly enjoyed this one for some reason!

    ReplyDelete
  3. I keep seeing this word "whinging". What in heaven's name does it mean? If you mean whining, rhymes with dining or mining, please say so. Whinging, rhymes with winging or singing, makes no sense whatsoever. I always thought, having spend 60 years in western Canada that I was reasonable familiar with the English language but this baffles me no end.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Whinging is a British term and has a soft "g" (i.e. sounds like a "j"). I have spent quite a bit of time working with people from various parts of the UK and I guess it rubbed off. It is also used on the east coast of Canada, probably because of our closer affiliation with the UK.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Seriously, is it pronounced like whining or like hinging? OK. I am never too old to learn something. And I really appreciate your blog though half the time it is beyond my meager financial and economics background (I am a ruminant nutritionist by education)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Like hinging. I also love their use of shyte for sh!t and use that all the time now - somehow, it sounds more cultured, don't you think?

      Ruminant as in cattle?

      Delete
  6. The elite that runs our world have been doing very well financially in recent times. It is also systemically corrupt.

    Whinging is also used in Australia. Win-jing.

    http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=whinging

    Example: When you get to Sydney after an 18-hour flight from London, it's hard to tell when the engines stop because of all the Poms whinging.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Sue. I love the example. Having done the flight from Western Canada to Oz and New Zealand several times, I probably did my share of whinging.

      Delete
  7. Interesting article! Thx for publishing

    ReplyDelete
  8. Great post. The majority of people do not even know this is going on!

    ReplyDelete
  9. See the documentary "Inside Job" for revelation of who started this financial landslide. It is available on DVD (and won an Oscar as best documentary)

    ReplyDelete
  10. I've seen it. Excellent documentary. It made me realize how close we all are to the precipice because of the actions of a few of the elite.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Great article: only wish that more of the 'whingers' would read it and start acting and stop 'whinging': move your current account out of the 'high street' bank into a mutualist or ethical bank.
    I'm sure that'll hurt them a bit!

    ReplyDelete
  12. I'm hoping the time nears when the mervyne kings and paul tuckers, masquarading as honorable, are exposed for what they really are... gussied up thieves. Sir Mervyne?? Shite!

    Disgusted Albertan.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I've seen how your comment over at "The Guardian" was removed by a moderator. I'm not going to say I agree with your political views; but I do find deleting your comment unjust.

    ReplyDelete
  14. A very interesting post, makes me wonder what will happen to the value of all the bonds issued over the last few years at record low interest rates when interest rates eventually rise, I expect pension funds will be hit again?

    ReplyDelete
  15. Could we possibly levy a swingeing tax on public sector pensions, please?

    ReplyDelete
  16. This is awesome post having a good status in the market, it is about the QE which is being given benifits,
    pension loan
    pension loans
    cashing in pension

    ReplyDelete